Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Conversion of loan into share capital attracts provisions of Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act. The term 'consideration' used in the section has wide implications, including non-monetary transactions. Conversion of loan into equity does not exempt the assessee from Section 56(2)(viib). The fair market value (FMV) of shares must be determined using prescribed valuation methods like discounted cash flow or net asset value consistently. Significant fluctuations in share premium within a short period without justification indicate undervaluation, attracting addition u/s 56(2)(viib) for excess premium over FMV. The assessee's contentions regarding non-applicability of Section 56(2)(viib) and lack of valuation rules were rejected. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition made u/s 56(2)(viib) for excess share premium over FMV.
Conversion of loan into share capital attracts provisions of Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act. The term 'consideration' used in the section has wide implications, including non-monetary transactions. Conversion of loan into equity does not exempt the assessee from Section 56(2)(viib). The fair market value (FMV) of shares must be determined using prescribed valuation methods like discounted cash flow or net asset value consistently. Significant fluctuations in share premium within a short period without justification indicate undervaluation, attracting addition u/s 56(2)(viib) for excess premium over FMV. The assessee's contentions regarding non-applicability of Section 56(2)(viib) and lack of valuation rules were rejected. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the addition made u/s 56(2)(viib) for excess share premium over FMV.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
