Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Addition u/s 56(2)(x) relates to joint ownership of property. If the consideration amount is fixed on the agreement date but registration occurs later, the stamp duty value on the agreement date should be considered. However, this applies only when the consideration is paid through banking channels before registration. In the present case, payments were made through proper channels before registration. Although the allotment letter is not a registered agreement, it contains agreed terms and conditions, making it covered under the proviso to section 56(2)(x). Since the assessee agreed to purchase the under-construction property in 2016 through the allotment letter and made payments before registration, the stamp duty value on the allotment date should be treated as the value for section 56(2)(x). The stamp duty value on the allotment date was within the 10% tolerance limit compared to the agreement value, so no addition is required u/s 56(2)(x) for the assessee or their spouse.
Addition u/s 56(2)(x) relates to joint ownership of property. If the consideration amount is fixed on the agreement date but registration occurs later, the stamp duty value on the agreement date should be considered. However, this applies only when the consideration is paid through banking channels before registration. In the present case, payments were made through proper channels before registration. Although the allotment letter is not a registered agreement, it contains agreed terms and conditions, making it covered under the proviso to section 56(2)(x). Since the assessee agreed to purchase the under-construction property in 2016 through the allotment letter and made payments before registration, the stamp duty value on the allotment date should be treated as the value for section 56(2)(x). The stamp duty value on the allotment date was within the 10% tolerance limit compared to the agreement value, so no addition is required u/s 56(2)(x) for the assessee or their spouse.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
