Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Addition u/s 56(2)(x) relates to joint ownership of property. If the consideration amount is fixed on the agreement date but registration occurs later, the stamp duty value on the agreement date should be considered. However, this applies only when the consideration is paid through banking channels before registration. In the present case, payments were made through proper channels before registration. Although the allotment letter is not a registered agreement, it contains agreed terms and conditions, making it covered under the proviso to section 56(2)(x). Since the assessee agreed to purchase the under-construction property in 2016 through the allotment letter and made payments before registration, the stamp duty value on the allotment date should be treated as the value for section 56(2)(x). The stamp duty value on the allotment date was within the 10% tolerance limit compared to the agreement value, so no addition is required u/s 56(2)(x) for the assessee or their spouse.
Addition u/s 56(2)(x) relates to joint ownership of property. If the consideration amount is fixed on the agreement date but registration occurs later, the stamp duty value on the agreement date should be considered. However, this applies only when the consideration is paid through banking channels before registration. In the present case, payments were made through proper channels before registration. Although the allotment letter is not a registered agreement, it contains agreed terms and conditions, making it covered under the proviso to section 56(2)(x). Since the assessee agreed to purchase the under-construction property in 2016 through the allotment letter and made payments before registration, the stamp duty value on the allotment date should be treated as the value for section 56(2)(x). The stamp duty value on the allotment date was within the 10% tolerance limit compared to the agreement value, so no addition is required u/s 56(2)(x) for the assessee or their spouse.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
