Alternative statutory remedy under GST bars writ challenge where classification, notice variance, and hearing disputes require factual appellate revie...
Duplicate PAN cancellation timeframe requires prior administrative representation before judicial intervention, ensuring a time-bound decision on the ...
Natural justice and pre-CIRP labour awards protect termination compensation, permitting withdrawal of court deposits despite later insolvency resoluti...
Arbitration of SEZ sub-lease monetary claims preserves rent, maintenance, termination, improvements and damages disputes while unused premises are vac...
Scientific research approval grants a research association tax recognition, subject to annual donor reporting, certification, and regulatory complianc...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 97820 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Pre-existing dispute between parties regarding inflated invoices issued by appellant's staff/employees for different project under same Master Service Agreement. Corporate debtor entitled to rights/liabilities under Principal Agreement, so dispute over invoices covered. Appellant commenced investigation, filed police complaint after learning of inflated invoices. Correspondence shows corporate debtor disputed entitlement/payment before demand notice, indicating pre-existing dispute. Adjudicating authority rightly rejected Section 9 application due to pre-existing dispute evident from prior correspondence. No error by adjudicating authority in rejecting application. Appeal dismissed by appellate tribunal as lacking merit.
Pre-existing dispute between parties regarding inflated invoices issued by appellant's staff/employees for different project under same Master Service Agreement. Corporate debtor entitled to rights/liabilities under Principal Agreement, so dispute over invoices covered. Appellant commenced investigation, filed police complaint after learning of inflated invoices. Correspondence shows corporate debtor disputed entitlement/payment before demand notice, indicating pre-existing dispute. Adjudicating authority rightly rejected Section 9 application due to pre-existing dispute evident from prior correspondence. No error by adjudicating authority in rejecting application. Appeal dismissed by appellate tribunal as lacking merit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
