Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Assessee challenged addition on account of unproved sundry creditors u/s 41(1), contending evidence of liability cessation was provided. AO held assessee failed to prove identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness despite opportunities. However, assessee filed relevant details of sundry credits with opening balances and settlements in relevant year. Revenue's attempt to invoke section 68 lacked discussion on assessee's failure to discharge onus. ITAT concluded in these facts, whether u/s 41(1) or 68, AO could not make impugned addition on both counts. Addition rejected accordingly.
Assessee challenged addition on account of unproved sundry creditors u/s 41(1), contending evidence of liability cessation was provided. AO held assessee failed to prove identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness despite opportunities. However, assessee filed relevant details of sundry credits with opening balances and settlements in relevant year. Revenue's attempt to invoke section 68 lacked discussion on assessee's failure to discharge onus. ITAT concluded in these facts, whether u/s 41(1) or 68, AO could not make impugned addition on both counts. Addition rejected accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
