Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search ✕
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
❮ Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Filters / Advanced Search ❯
TEXT

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In
Main Text + AI Text ❯
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws---- ❯
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ---- ❯
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ---- ❯
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
☰   Show Results ❯
    Binding GST appellate orders require consequential refunds unless statutory withholding safeguards, including hearing, are satisfied.
    Parallel GST proceedings for one tax period were quashed while earlier exemption proceedings continue for fresh consideration.
    Rule 88C mismatch proceedings require examination before a Section 73 adjudication can be lawfully sustained.
    GST refund limitation permits writ-based delay condonation where double reversal of transitional credit requires statutory reconsideration.
    Differential GST on government works contracts must be reimbursed by the service recipient, subject to verification of records and calculations.
    Advance ruling jurisdiction under GST requires the applicant's own supply, barring questions on another person's obligations.
    Going-concern business transfers qualify as services, but exemption requires proof; otherwise transferred stock and assets are taxable goods.
    Battery-free electric vehicles retain preferential GST classification, while input-tax-credit refund claims lie outside advance-ruling jurisdiction.
    Self-invoice value for imported related-party services is deemed open market value where full input tax credit is available.
    Water-supply exemption excludes infrastructure construction and repair works, leaving pipeline works contracts taxable under GST.
    Finality of Settlement Orders Bars Reassessment of Housing-Project Deductions Already Covered by the Settlement Process
    Section 91 CrPC requires necessary search records; witness recall fails without evidence essential to a just decision.
    TDS refund entitlement under appellate give-effect orders cannot be deferred by post-assessment technical requirements alone.
    Subsequently noticed escaped income permits enlargement of pending reassessment using search material without separate pre-notice compliance.
    Income accrual for non-residents requires a real Indian nexus, defeating reassessment where rights and activity are overseas.
    Social forestry expenditure requires activity-based classification, limiting book-profit adjustments and preserving penalty relief where normal additi...
    MFN treaty benefits require specific domestic notification, leaving tax refund interest taxable at the Netherlands treaty interest rate.
    Assignment of contractual property rights attracts capital gains, while penny-stock sale proceeds may be taxed as unexplained cash credits
    Approved valuation reports support improvement-cost claims, while unsupported interior spending cannot qualify for residential reinvestment relief.
    Stock exchange compliance charges qualify as deductible business expenditure; bona fide cess claims cannot trigger under-reporting penalties.
❮
❯
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Taxation of long-term capital gains arising from a development...

Taxation of Capital Gains in Joint Development Agreement Validated; Territorial AO's Jurisdiction Confirmed by ITAT.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Income Tax November 19, 2024 Case Laws AT
Taxation of long-term capital gains arising from a development agreement u/s 153C read with Section 144C(3) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee, being an NRI, was assessed to have no source of income in India and was taxable under the residual charge at Delhi. The jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) u/s 153C read with Section 144C(3) was challenged, but the ITAT held that the AO having territorial jurisdiction where the property is situated and where the necessary documents/information is available should be the appropriate forum for adjudication. Section 127 was not applicable as there was no transfer of jurisdiction from one authority to another. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision that a transfer took place on account of the Joint Development Agreement (JDA) entered on 30.12.2015, as the assessee was entitled to receive built-up flats, indicating a transfer of land/capital asset. The taxable event occurred in the assessment year 2016-17, and the income was rightly charged in that year. The valuation of the property at Rs. 5,000 per sq.yd by the AO was upheld, rejecting the registered valuer's valuation of Rs. 8,000 per sq.ft, as the valuation report did not.

Topics

Acts Income Tax