Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    HUF property taxation: individual ownership evidence excluded stamp-duty value difference from taxation under the deemed receipt provision.
    Binding interim judicial directions protected employers from withholding default on foreign-leg leave travel concession payments despite later clarifi...
    Rectification jurisdiction excludes debatable income computation, leaving capital receipt and expenditure treatment for appellate determination.
    Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
    Jurisdictional notice requirement invalidates scrutiny assessments when the assessing officer completing assessment issued no statutory notice.
    Reasonable cause for emergency cash loans protected genuine acceptance and repayment transactions from statutory penalties.
    Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
    Credible material of corruption is required for an independent investigation; clearance delays and valuation disputes alone are insufficient.
    Baggage import jurisdiction remains outside Tribunal appeals, directing confiscation and penalty disputes to the statutory revisional remedy.
    Glow Plug Control Units classified as engine starting equipment; extended demand and penalty fail without suppression or evasion intent.
    IGST import refund limitation commenced only after a prescribed mechanism existed, making United Nations agency claims timely.
    Customs supervision charges cannot shift to cost recovery without an actual exclusive officer posting beyond regular staffing.
    Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
    Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
    Foreign judgment presumption supports asset disclosure, while appellate review preserves reasonably exercised interlocutory discretion and maintains r...
    Reasoned fraud classification requires disclosed application of mind, while adequate prior opportunity satisfies natural justice requirements.
    Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
    Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
    Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
    Original works valuation applies to showroom fit-outs, while forfeited purchase advances and fire-loss reimbursements are not taxable services.
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Highlights
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries

    Highlights

    Back

    All Highlights

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      Highlights

      Back

      All Highlights

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Assessee company failed to deduct tax at source as reflected in...

      Tax Demand Time-Barred as Order Issued Beyond Statutory Limits; Tribunal Upholds Assessee's Appeal for FY 2010-11.

      Contents
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Income TaxNovember 19, 2024Case LawsAT
      Assessee company failed to deduct tax at source as reflected in Tax Auditor's report. Demand u/s 201(1)/201(14) was barred by limitation. Assessee submitted that Assessing Officer's order was time-barred. Scope of amendment to Section 201(3) was examined. For deductors filing TDS statement, limitation period of two years remained unchanged. For non-filing, it was extended from four to six years. Subsequently, uniform limitation of seven years was introduced prospectively from October 1, 2014. In the present case, for FY 2010-11, where statement was filed on May 13, 2011, the time limit for passing order u/s 201(1) was March 31, 2014. However, the Assessing Officer passed the order on March 28, 2018, beyond the prescribed time limit. Hence, the Appellate Tribunal rightly allowed the appeal, dismissing the revenue's appeal as the assessment was time-barred.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax