Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Page of 4915
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1861 to 1880 of 98300 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
This is a summary of an order from the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) covering various issues related to the allowability of deductions and expenses claimed by the assessee company. The key points are: Disallowance of deduction u/ss 80IB/80IE for interest on staff advances and statutory/bank deposits was upheld based on coordinate bench rulings. Expenditure for doctors' accommodation and business promotion was disallowed, but the assessee was allowed higher deduction u/ss 80IB/80IE on such disallowance as per CBDT Circular. Disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D was set aside for re-computation based on availability of interest-free funds. Disallowance u/r 8D(2)(iii) was remanded back for re-verification. No adjustment was required to book profits u/s 115JB for amortization of intangibles recorded at fair value pursuant to a scheme of arrangement, following coordinate bench rulings. Stamp duty charges incurred for increasing authorized capital pursuant to a court-sanctioned scheme were disallowed as capital expenditure based on Supreme Court judgments. Delayed payment of employees' contribution to ESIC was disallowed u/s 36(1)(va) read with Section 2(24)(x.
This is a summary of an order from the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) covering various issues related to the allowability of deductions and expenses claimed by the assessee company. The key points are: Disallowance of deduction u/ss 80IB/80IE for interest on staff advances and statutory/bank deposits was upheld based on coordinate bench rulings. Expenditure for doctors' accommodation and business promotion was disallowed, but the assessee was allowed higher deduction u/ss 80IB/80IE on such disallowance as per CBDT Circular. Disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D was set aside for re-computation based on availability of interest-free funds. Disallowance u/r 8D(2)(iii) was remanded back for re-verification. No adjustment was required to book profits u/s 115JB for amortization of intangibles recorded at fair value pursuant to a scheme of arrangement, following coordinate bench rulings. Stamp duty charges incurred for increasing authorized capital pursuant to a court-sanctioned scheme were disallowed as capital expenditure based on Supreme Court judgments. Delayed payment of employees' contribution to ESIC was disallowed u/s 36(1)(va) read with Section 2(24)(x.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.