Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
This is a summary of an order from the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) covering various issues related to the allowability of deductions and expenses claimed by the assessee company. The key points are: Disallowance of deduction u/ss 80IB/80IE for interest on staff advances and statutory/bank deposits was upheld based on coordinate bench rulings. Expenditure for doctors' accommodation and business promotion was disallowed, but the assessee was allowed higher deduction u/ss 80IB/80IE on such disallowance as per CBDT Circular. Disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D was set aside for re-computation based on availability of interest-free funds. Disallowance u/r 8D(2)(iii) was remanded back for re-verification. No adjustment was required to book profits u/s 115JB for amortization of intangibles recorded at fair value pursuant to a scheme of arrangement, following coordinate bench rulings. Stamp duty charges incurred for increasing authorized capital pursuant to a court-sanctioned scheme were disallowed as capital expenditure based on Supreme Court judgments. Delayed payment of employees' contribution to ESIC was disallowed u/s 36(1)(va) read with Section 2(24)(x.
This is a summary of an order from the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) covering various issues related to the allowability of deductions and expenses claimed by the assessee company. The key points are: Disallowance of deduction u/ss 80IB/80IE for interest on staff advances and statutory/bank deposits was upheld based on coordinate bench rulings. Expenditure for doctors' accommodation and business promotion was disallowed, but the assessee was allowed higher deduction u/ss 80IB/80IE on such disallowance as per CBDT Circular. Disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D was set aside for re-computation based on availability of interest-free funds. Disallowance u/r 8D(2)(iii) was remanded back for re-verification. No adjustment was required to book profits u/s 115JB for amortization of intangibles recorded at fair value pursuant to a scheme of arrangement, following coordinate bench rulings. Stamp duty charges incurred for increasing authorized capital pursuant to a court-sanctioned scheme were disallowed as capital expenditure based on Supreme Court judgments. Delayed payment of employees' contribution to ESIC was disallowed u/s 36(1)(va) read with Section 2(24)(x.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.