Capital character of assignment consideration prevents taxation as residuary income, while unsupported interest-related expenditure remains non-deduct...
Make-available condition shields regional support-service receipts from Indian taxation where no independent capability or permanent establishment exi...
Transfer-pricing treatment of corporate guarantees and convertible loans followed prior-year consistency, with taxable foreign dividends excluded from...
Transfer-pricing benchmarking confines adjustments to associated-enterprise transactions and integrates delayed receivables through TNMM working-capit...
Medical relief status protects government-contracted mobile healthcare from commercial classification, while provisional registration cancellation req...
Charitable registration cancellation requires proof that educational activities abandoned their objects; incidental receipts and retained surplus are ...
Prospective customs notification amendments cannot bar provisional release consideration for earlier imports when bills of lading predate their commen...
This is a summary of an order from the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) covering various issues related to the allowability of deductions and expenses claimed by the assessee company. The key points are: Disallowance of deduction u/ss 80IB/80IE for interest on staff advances and statutory/bank deposits was upheld based on coordinate bench rulings. Expenditure for doctors' accommodation and business promotion was disallowed, but the assessee was allowed higher deduction u/ss 80IB/80IE on such disallowance as per CBDT Circular. Disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D was set aside for re-computation based on availability of interest-free funds. Disallowance u/r 8D(2)(iii) was remanded back for re-verification. No adjustment was required to book profits u/s 115JB for amortization of intangibles recorded at fair value pursuant to a scheme of arrangement, following coordinate bench rulings. Stamp duty charges incurred for increasing authorized capital pursuant to a court-sanctioned scheme were disallowed as capital expenditure based on Supreme Court judgments. Delayed payment of employees' contribution to ESIC was disallowed u/s 36(1)(va) read with Section 2(24)(x.
This is a summary of an order from the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) covering various issues related to the allowability of deductions and expenses claimed by the assessee company. The key points are: Disallowance of deduction u/ss 80IB/80IE for interest on staff advances and statutory/bank deposits was upheld based on coordinate bench rulings. Expenditure for doctors' accommodation and business promotion was disallowed, but the assessee was allowed higher deduction u/ss 80IB/80IE on such disallowance as per CBDT Circular. Disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D was set aside for re-computation based on availability of interest-free funds. Disallowance u/r 8D(2)(iii) was remanded back for re-verification. No adjustment was required to book profits u/s 115JB for amortization of intangibles recorded at fair value pursuant to a scheme of arrangement, following coordinate bench rulings. Stamp duty charges incurred for increasing authorized capital pursuant to a court-sanctioned scheme were disallowed as capital expenditure based on Supreme Court judgments. Delayed payment of employees' contribution to ESIC was disallowed u/s 36(1)(va) read with Section 2(24)(x.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4910 
