Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Foreign-currency loan benchmarking follows the loan currency, while export hedging losses qualify as non-speculative business losses.
    Delayed initiation of TDS return penalties after nine years rendered the penalty illegal and unsustainable.
    Project-development assistance treated as capital, while infrastructure construction costs may be amortised over the concession period.
    Delayed trade receivables require separate transfer pricing benchmarking, subject to debt-free status and an appropriate credit period.
    Modified returns, MAT book profit limits, and tested-party selection shape transfer pricing treatment of integrated intra-group services.
    Transfer pricing comparability requires functional alignment, reliable financial data, and careful review of working capital and receivables adjustmen...
    Transfer pricing rules require benchmarking corporate guarantees and associated-enterprise advances, while invalid domestic-transaction adjustments ca...
    Share valuation method choice protects DCF valuations from replacement with NAV, though projections remain open to scrutiny.
    Penalty immunity requires reconsideration where rectification removes the assessment demand and leaves a refund instead.
    Under-reporting penalty applies when taxable income is not returned, even if reassessment disclosure is accepted without additions.
    Benami RTGS credits unsupported by independent evidence justified attachment, while unproven prejudice defeated the natural justice challenge.
    Prospective sugar export prohibition required registered letters of credit; private contracts and export quotas created no enforceable continuation ri...
    Brand rate drawback for bus bodies may coexist with DEPB where duplicate duty reimbursement is not established by evidence.
    Made-up textile article classification governs triangular umbrella panels, while full customs disclosure prevents extended limitation in classificatio...
    Abetment penalties require proof that a Customs Broker representative knowingly facilitated improper importation of prohibited goods.
    Actual user conditions prohibit disguised sales of duty-free inputs through arrangements labelled as job work.
    Abetment of attempted export requires proven positive assistance or knowledge; penalties cannot rest on unsupported allegations of concealment.
    Unsubmitted arbitral award claims are extinguished by approved resolution plans, while court-deposited security remains the corporate debtor's asset.
    Retroactive interim-moratorium exclusion permits protective asset disclosure and preservation measures against personal guarantors pending arbitration...
    Pre-existing operational debt dispute and post-admission settlement led to reversal of CIRP admission and closure of insolvency proceedings.
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Highlights
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries

    Highlights

    Back

    All Highlights

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      Highlights

      Back

      All Highlights

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      The order addresses the computation of the limitation period for...

      Appeal Timing Under IBC: 30-Day Limit, 15-Day Extension Possible; E-Filing Date Determines Limitation Period, Delay Excused.

      Contents
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      IBCNovember 19, 2024Case LawsAT
      The order addresses the computation of the limitation period for filing an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal u/s 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The key points are: The appellant has a statutory right to file an appeal within 30 days u/s 61(2), with an additional 15 days if there is sufficient cause for delay. The appeal was filed on 30.05.2022 through e-filing, and the hard copy was filed on 20.06.2022, before the effective date of the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) dated 21.10.2022. The SOP dated 21.10.2022 was withdrawn by the SOP dated 24.12.2022, which stipulated that the limitation period is to be counted from the date of e-filing. Following the Supreme Court's decision in Somdev Kappor, the rules prevalent at the time of considering the application are applicable. Therefore, the SOP dated 24.12.2022 is applicable, and the limitation period is to be calculated from the date of e-filing. The respondent's objection that the limitation should be counted from the date of presentation at the counter is overruled. The delay of three days in filing the appeal is condoned as sufficient reason has been assigned by the appellant u/s 61(2) proviso.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax