Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Extraordinary writ jurisdiction cannot revive a time-barred statutory GST appeal merely because appellate limitation has expired.
    Natural justice in GST appeals requires a hearing and reasoned order; cryptic rejection was quashed and remanded.
    Consistency in export-service classification supports input tax credit refunds where identical services lack distinguishing features.
    Mandatory hearing before adverse GST determination protects natural justice; unconsidered replies invalidate resulting demand and appellate action.
    Deemed withdrawal of best-judgment assessment follows delayed return filing when the prescribed late fee is paid.
    Commensurate price reduction for input tax credit cannot be replaced by free upgrades, with GST and interest repayable.
    Statutory labelling and institutional-consumer packaging preserved GST exemption for frozen chicken cuts despite corporate names appearing on invoices...
    Scrutiny selection reasons need not be disclosed where a specific information notice is issued during assessment proceedings.
    Development-rights compensation may not accrue to landholders where contractual rights vest commercially in the developer, preventing double taxation.
    Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
    Interim judicial directions on LTC/LFC reimbursements prevented employer TDS default treatment and consequential interest liability.
    Real net winnings govern online gaming taxability, preventing gross wallet credits from being treated as taxable income.
    TDS credit follows taxable income, preventing a former proprietor from claiming deductions attributable to a successor partnership firm.
    Commercial expediency supports interest deductions where interest-free advances fund a wholly owned subsidiary's genuine group business project.
    Marketing expenditure substantiation may justify limited disallowance, but does not alone establish income misreporting for penalty purposes.
    Dealing-error and squared-off derivative losses qualify as allowable business losses when supported by contemporaneous transaction records.
    Prohibited versus restricted imports: provisional release remains available where tyre classification and compliance conditions await adjudication.
    RoDTEP duty credit for authorised restricted sugar exports cannot be denied where prescribed governmental conditions are fulfilled.
    Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
    Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Highlights
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries

    Highlights

    Back

    All Highlights

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      Highlights

      Back

      All Highlights

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      The order addresses the computation of the limitation period for...

      Appeal Timing Under IBC: 30-Day Limit, 15-Day Extension Possible; E-Filing Date Determines Limitation Period, Delay Excused.

      Contents
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      IBCNovember 19, 2024Case LawsAT
      The order addresses the computation of the limitation period for filing an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal u/s 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The key points are: The appellant has a statutory right to file an appeal within 30 days u/s 61(2), with an additional 15 days if there is sufficient cause for delay. The appeal was filed on 30.05.2022 through e-filing, and the hard copy was filed on 20.06.2022, before the effective date of the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) dated 21.10.2022. The SOP dated 21.10.2022 was withdrawn by the SOP dated 24.12.2022, which stipulated that the limitation period is to be counted from the date of e-filing. Following the Supreme Court's decision in Somdev Kappor, the rules prevalent at the time of considering the application are applicable. Therefore, the SOP dated 24.12.2022 is applicable, and the limitation period is to be calculated from the date of e-filing. The respondent's objection that the limitation should be counted from the date of presentation at the counter is overruled. The delay of three days in filing the appeal is condoned as sufficient reason has been assigned by the appellant u/s 61(2) proviso.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax