Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
    Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
    Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
    Tax-transparent partnership treaty entitlement is assessed partner by partner, while legal-service receipts are not technical-service fees.
    Rural agricultural land exclusion shields enhanced acquisition compensation and section 28 interest when the land is not a capital asset.
    Trust character follows dominant objects and activities, supporting charitable registration and approval despite incidental religious expenditure.
    Scrutiny notice format defects are curable where statutory requirements are met and the taxpayer suffers no prejudice.
    Protective additions for alleged commission receipts fail when corresponding substantive additions are deleted and no supporting evidence exists.
    Unified peak credit prevents separate taxation of rotating unaccounted cash reflected in common seized group cash books.
    Special vehicles confined to enclosed premises fall outside motor vehicle regulation where they are not adapted for road use.
    Customs valuation disputes must be appealed to the Supreme Court, leaving the High Court without appellate jurisdiction.
    Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
    Writ maintainability despite alternative remedies permits scrutiny of arbitrary money-laundering initiation, but account-freezing relief requires prim...
    Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
    Personal liberty in economic-offence bail requires compelling custody justification; bail granted where the triple test was unmet.
    Nicotine Sulphate classification as a vegetable alkaloid defeated reclassification, extended limitation, and unsupported related-party valuation claim...
    Payee or holder status governs cheque-dishonour complaints; proceedings by an unauthorised deceased payee's heir were quashed.
    Harmonised export classification updates revise ITC (HS) entries, policy conditions and prohibited goods with immediate effect.
    Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
    Unsigned GST DRC forms challenge may be pursued through statutory appeal, subject to pre-deposit and delay condonation consideration.
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Highlights
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries

    Highlights

    Back

    All Highlights

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      Highlights

      Back

      All Highlights

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      The order addresses the computation of the limitation period for...

      Appeal Timing Under IBC: 30-Day Limit, 15-Day Extension Possible; E-Filing Date Determines Limitation Period, Delay Excused.

      Contents
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      IBCNovember 19, 2024Case LawsAT
      The order addresses the computation of the limitation period for filing an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal u/s 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The key points are: The appellant has a statutory right to file an appeal within 30 days u/s 61(2), with an additional 15 days if there is sufficient cause for delay. The appeal was filed on 30.05.2022 through e-filing, and the hard copy was filed on 20.06.2022, before the effective date of the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) dated 21.10.2022. The SOP dated 21.10.2022 was withdrawn by the SOP dated 24.12.2022, which stipulated that the limitation period is to be counted from the date of e-filing. Following the Supreme Court's decision in Somdev Kappor, the rules prevalent at the time of considering the application are applicable. Therefore, the SOP dated 24.12.2022 is applicable, and the limitation period is to be calculated from the date of e-filing. The respondent's objection that the limitation should be counted from the date of presentation at the counter is overruled. The delay of three days in filing the appeal is condoned as sufficient reason has been assigned by the appellant u/s 61(2) proviso.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax