Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Joint development agreements defer taxable transfer where possession lacks part performance, while completed flats determine consideration and exempti...
Passenger baggage re-export requires true declaration and cannot be granted indirectly through discretionary redemption of undeclared prohibited goods...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Imported material diverted to unit other than permitted unit, resulting in contravention of import-export policy provisions. Goods held liable for confiscation u/s 111 and importer penalized u/s 112 of Customs Act. Appellant claimed permission for Wada unit valid for Panipat unit, refuted by Ministry's clarification. Confiscation and penalty upheld, but redemption fine reduced to Rs.3 lakhs and penalty to Rs.2 lakhs considering total value of Rs.22 lakhs. Appellate Tribunal's order regarding diversion of imported goods to unauthorized unit and consequent penalties.
Imported material diverted to unit other than permitted unit, resulting in contravention of import-export policy provisions. Goods held liable for confiscation u/s 111 and importer penalized u/s 112 of Customs Act. Appellant claimed permission for Wada unit valid for Panipat unit, refuted by Ministry's clarification. Confiscation and penalty upheld, but redemption fine reduced to Rs.3 lakhs and penalty to Rs.2 lakhs considering total value of Rs.22 lakhs. Appellate Tribunal's order regarding diversion of imported goods to unauthorized unit and consequent penalties.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.