Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Imported material diverted to unit other than permitted unit, resulting in contravention of import-export policy provisions. Goods held liable for confiscation u/s 111 and importer penalized u/s 112 of Customs Act. Appellant claimed permission for Wada unit valid for Panipat unit, refuted by Ministry's clarification. Confiscation and penalty upheld, but redemption fine reduced to Rs.3 lakhs and penalty to Rs.2 lakhs considering total value of Rs.22 lakhs. Appellate Tribunal's order regarding diversion of imported goods to unauthorized unit and consequent penalties.
Imported material diverted to unit other than permitted unit, resulting in contravention of import-export policy provisions. Goods held liable for confiscation u/s 111 and importer penalized u/s 112 of Customs Act. Appellant claimed permission for Wada unit valid for Panipat unit, refuted by Ministry's clarification. Confiscation and penalty upheld, but redemption fine reduced to Rs.3 lakhs and penalty to Rs.2 lakhs considering total value of Rs.22 lakhs. Appellate Tribunal's order regarding diversion of imported goods to unauthorized unit and consequent penalties.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
