Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
A resolution plan was approved for the petitioner on 26.03.2021 under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) demanded property tax from the petitioner for the period prior to the approval date. The court relied on Ghanashyam Mishra case, which held that upon approval of a resolution plan, all statutory dues owed to government authorities prior to the approval date stand extinguished if not included in the plan. MCD did not lodge its claim during the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP). Consequently, MCD cannot demand property tax dues prior to 26.03.2021. The Rainbow Papers case is distinguished as the statutory authority there had lodged its claim during CIRP. An interim stay was granted on MCD's demand for pre-approval period, while directing the petitioner to pay property tax after 26.03.2021. The matter was listed for further hearing.
A resolution plan was approved for the petitioner on 26.03.2021 under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) demanded property tax from the petitioner for the period prior to the approval date. The court relied on Ghanashyam Mishra case, which held that upon approval of a resolution plan, all statutory dues owed to government authorities prior to the approval date stand extinguished if not included in the plan. MCD did not lodge its claim during the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP). Consequently, MCD cannot demand property tax dues prior to 26.03.2021. The Rainbow Papers case is distinguished as the statutory authority there had lodged its claim during CIRP. An interim stay was granted on MCD's demand for pre-approval period, while directing the petitioner to pay property tax after 26.03.2021. The matter was listed for further hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
