Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
A resolution plan was approved for the petitioner on 26.03.2021 under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) demanded property tax from the petitioner for the period prior to the approval date. The court relied on Ghanashyam Mishra case, which held that upon approval of a resolution plan, all statutory dues owed to government authorities prior to the approval date stand extinguished if not included in the plan. MCD did not lodge its claim during the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP). Consequently, MCD cannot demand property tax dues prior to 26.03.2021. The Rainbow Papers case is distinguished as the statutory authority there had lodged its claim during CIRP. An interim stay was granted on MCD's demand for pre-approval period, while directing the petitioner to pay property tax after 26.03.2021. The matter was listed for further hearing.
A resolution plan was approved for the petitioner on 26.03.2021 under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) demanded property tax from the petitioner for the period prior to the approval date. The court relied on Ghanashyam Mishra case, which held that upon approval of a resolution plan, all statutory dues owed to government authorities prior to the approval date stand extinguished if not included in the plan. MCD did not lodge its claim during the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP). Consequently, MCD cannot demand property tax dues prior to 26.03.2021. The Rainbow Papers case is distinguished as the statutory authority there had lodged its claim during CIRP. An interim stay was granted on MCD's demand for pre-approval period, while directing the petitioner to pay property tax after 26.03.2021. The matter was listed for further hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
