Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A resolution plan was approved for the petitioner on 26.03.2021 under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) demanded property tax from the petitioner for the period prior to the approval date. The court relied on Ghanashyam Mishra case, which held that upon approval of a resolution plan, all statutory dues owed to government authorities prior to the approval date stand extinguished if not included in the plan. MCD did not lodge its claim during the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP). Consequently, MCD cannot demand property tax dues prior to 26.03.2021. The Rainbow Papers case is distinguished as the statutory authority there had lodged its claim during CIRP. An interim stay was granted on MCD's demand for pre-approval period, while directing the petitioner to pay property tax after 26.03.2021. The matter was listed for further hearing.
A resolution plan was approved for the petitioner on 26.03.2021 under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) demanded property tax from the petitioner for the period prior to the approval date. The court relied on Ghanashyam Mishra case, which held that upon approval of a resolution plan, all statutory dues owed to government authorities prior to the approval date stand extinguished if not included in the plan. MCD did not lodge its claim during the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP). Consequently, MCD cannot demand property tax dues prior to 26.03.2021. The Rainbow Papers case is distinguished as the statutory authority there had lodged its claim during CIRP. An interim stay was granted on MCD's demand for pre-approval period, while directing the petitioner to pay property tax after 26.03.2021. The matter was listed for further hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
