Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Royalty payments treated as revenue expenditure, deductible in full; capital expenditure treatment rejected. Bad debt deduction allowed u/s 28, following Supreme Court precedent in Shriram Chits case; Revenue appeal rejected. Division Bench judgment of same Court cited, clarifying expenditure to acquire intangible asset not automatically capital expenditure; enduring nature of benefit key consideration. Appellate orders deleting disallowances upheld by High Court.
Royalty payments treated as revenue expenditure, deductible in full; capital expenditure treatment rejected. Bad debt deduction allowed u/s 28, following Supreme Court precedent in Shriram Chits case; Revenue appeal rejected. Division Bench judgment of same Court cited, clarifying expenditure to acquire intangible asset not automatically capital expenditure; enduring nature of benefit key consideration. Appellate orders deleting disallowances upheld by High Court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
