Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Income estimation based on percentage of gross receipts - CIT(A) applied 12.5% net profit on gross receipts, assessee claimed thin margins in advertisement business. ITAT held some guesswork inevitable without financial data. CIT(A) lacked material for 12.5%, assessee failed to substantiate lower 1.5-2% claim. Section 44AD deems 8% of turnover as business income for eligible assessees based on empirical data. Guided by equity, ITAT considered 8% of gross receipts fair estimation, modifying CIT(A)'s 12.5% to 8%. Assessee's appeal partly allowed.
Income estimation based on percentage of gross receipts - CIT(A) applied 12.5% net profit on gross receipts, assessee claimed thin margins in advertisement business. ITAT held some guesswork inevitable without financial data. CIT(A) lacked material for 12.5%, assessee failed to substantiate lower 1.5-2% claim. Section 44AD deems 8% of turnover as business income for eligible assessees based on empirical data. Guided by equity, ITAT considered 8% of gross receipts fair estimation, modifying CIT(A)'s 12.5% to 8%. Assessee's appeal partly allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.