Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The RERA lacks jurisdiction over projects completed before its enactment. The project obtained Occupation/Completion Certificate prior to RERA's commencement, rendering the complaint inadmissible. Entertaining such complaints would grant retrospective effect to RERA, contrary to legislative intent. No provision allows pursuit of remedies under RERA for completed projects previously addressed under Consumer Protection Act. Authorities correctly dismissed the complaint due to lack of jurisdiction, as the project predated RERA's enactment. Forum shopping by withdrawing from prior proceedings is impermissible.
The RERA lacks jurisdiction over projects completed before its enactment. The project obtained Occupation/Completion Certificate prior to RERA's commencement, rendering the complaint inadmissible. Entertaining such complaints would grant retrospective effect to RERA, contrary to legislative intent. No provision allows pursuit of remedies under RERA for completed projects previously addressed under Consumer Protection Act. Authorities correctly dismissed the complaint due to lack of jurisdiction, as the project predated RERA's enactment. Forum shopping by withdrawing from prior proceedings is impermissible.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
