PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
The Court held that when a company fails to register a charge as mandated u/s 77 of the Companies Act, 2013, insisting on digital signatures from the company itself while filing Form CHG-1 u/s 78 for charge registration would contradict the very purpose of Section 78, which is designed to address such lapse or refusal by the company. The instructions for Form CHG-1 do not accommodate situations where the company's cooperation cannot be presumed. Therefore, the requirement for digital signatures from the company should not be insisted upon while filing Form CHG-1 u/s 78 when the company defaults on its statutory duty u/s 77. The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the view that digital signatures from the company need not be mandated in such circumstances.
The Court held that when a company fails to register a charge as mandated u/s 77 of the Companies Act, 2013, insisting on digital signatures from the company itself while filing Form CHG-1 u/s 78 for charge registration would contradict the very purpose of Section 78, which is designed to address such lapse or refusal by the company. The instructions for Form CHG-1 do not accommodate situations where the company's cooperation cannot be presumed. Therefore, the requirement for digital signatures from the company should not be insisted upon while filing Form CHG-1 u/s 78 when the company defaults on its statutory duty u/s 77. The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the view that digital signatures from the company need not be mandated in such circumstances.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
