Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
Ex-parte appellate order passed by CIT(A) based on statement of fact filed by assessee. Second round of litigation regarding whether assessee firm stood dissolved or business discontinued. Disallowance of freight expenses u/s 40(a)(ia). Assessee did not participate in appellate proceedings before CIT(A) for reasons cited in statement of fact. Huge additions made by AO and huge tax demand raised against assessee in second round. Assessee acted negligently during appellate proceedings before CIT(A) but should not be allowed to benefit from its own wrong. CIT(A) passed ex-parte order based on record including statement of fact. Assessee did not comply with CIT(A)'s notices. Act of court should not prejudice anybody. Mandate of 1961 Act is to compute and collect correct taxes. Assessee now arguing against additions before ITAT, filing paper book. Contradictory statements regarding dissolution of firm versus discontinuance of business. Inquiries to be conducted in interest of justice. Appellate order set aside, matter remanded to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication after giving opportunity to both parties u/ss 189(1), 189(3), 189(4) read with Section 176(3).
Ex-parte appellate order passed by CIT(A) based on statement of fact filed by assessee. Second round of litigation regarding whether assessee firm stood dissolved or business discontinued. Disallowance of freight expenses u/s 40(a)(ia). Assessee did not participate in appellate proceedings before CIT(A) for reasons cited in statement of fact. Huge additions made by AO and huge tax demand raised against assessee in second round. Assessee acted negligently during appellate proceedings before CIT(A) but should not be allowed to benefit from its own wrong. CIT(A) passed ex-parte order based on record including statement of fact. Assessee did not comply with CIT(A)'s notices. Act of court should not prejudice anybody. Mandate of 1961 Act is to compute and collect correct taxes. Assessee now arguing against additions before ITAT, filing paper book. Contradictory statements regarding dissolution of firm versus discontinuance of business. Inquiries to be conducted in interest of justice. Appellate order set aside, matter remanded to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication after giving opportunity to both parties u/ss 189(1), 189(3), 189(4) read with Section 176(3).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
