Transfer-pricing aggregation of distinct support-service and subcontract transactions was rejected, while debt-free receivables attracted no notional ...
Customs exemptions cover photovoltaic assembly machinery and PVF backsheets, while fully declared cleared imports may avoid confiscation and penalties...
Specific tariff classification for LCD devices overrides treatment as electricity-meter parts, defeating differential duty, extended limitation, and p...
Stayed disciplinary punishment does not establish unfitness for insolvency professional registration; reconsideration must disregard mere pendency of ...
Indirect corporate control can create related-party status, excluding financial creditors from Committee of Creditors representation, participation an...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reassessment proceedings' validity questioned due to lack of appropriate authority's sanction u/s 151. Legality of jurisdiction, assessment orders, and notices issued under Income Tax Act examined. Held that if assessment order and notices u/ss 148A and 148 contravene Sections 151A and 151 as interpreted in Hexaware and Siemens cases, Appellate and Revisionary Authorities, bound by jurisdictional High Court decisions, must consider this legal position. Petitioner can raise such contentions before these authorities. Writ petitions adjudicating issues pending before Appellate Authority should not be entertained when it can decide per High Court rulings. Petitioner should pursue pending appellate and revisionary proceedings. If assessment order and Section 148 notice prima facie illegal per Hexaware and Siemens, they should not be given effect until appellate and revisionary proceedings decided.
Reassessment proceedings' validity questioned due to lack of appropriate authority's sanction u/s 151. Legality of jurisdiction, assessment orders, and notices issued under Income Tax Act examined. Held that if assessment order and notices u/ss 148A and 148 contravene Sections 151A and 151 as interpreted in Hexaware and Siemens cases, Appellate and Revisionary Authorities, bound by jurisdictional High Court decisions, must consider this legal position. Petitioner can raise such contentions before these authorities. Writ petitions adjudicating issues pending before Appellate Authority should not be entertained when it can decide per High Court rulings. Petitioner should pursue pending appellate and revisionary proceedings. If assessment order and Section 148 notice prima facie illegal per Hexaware and Siemens, they should not be given effect until appellate and revisionary proceedings decided.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
