Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Time-share accommodation classification excludes Club or Association Service where purchasers receive contractual occupancy rights without genuine mem...
CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolut...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reassessment proceedings' validity questioned due to lack of appropriate authority's sanction u/s 151. Legality of jurisdiction, assessment orders, and notices issued under Income Tax Act examined. Held that if assessment order and notices u/ss 148A and 148 contravene Sections 151A and 151 as interpreted in Hexaware and Siemens cases, Appellate and Revisionary Authorities, bound by jurisdictional High Court decisions, must consider this legal position. Petitioner can raise such contentions before these authorities. Writ petitions adjudicating issues pending before Appellate Authority should not be entertained when it can decide per High Court rulings. Petitioner should pursue pending appellate and revisionary proceedings. If assessment order and Section 148 notice prima facie illegal per Hexaware and Siemens, they should not be given effect until appellate and revisionary proceedings decided.
Reassessment proceedings' validity questioned due to lack of appropriate authority's sanction u/s 151. Legality of jurisdiction, assessment orders, and notices issued under Income Tax Act examined. Held that if assessment order and notices u/ss 148A and 148 contravene Sections 151A and 151 as interpreted in Hexaware and Siemens cases, Appellate and Revisionary Authorities, bound by jurisdictional High Court decisions, must consider this legal position. Petitioner can raise such contentions before these authorities. Writ petitions adjudicating issues pending before Appellate Authority should not be entertained when it can decide per High Court rulings. Petitioner should pursue pending appellate and revisionary proceedings. If assessment order and Section 148 notice prima facie illegal per Hexaware and Siemens, they should not be given effect until appellate and revisionary proceedings decided.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
