Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
321 to 340 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 234E late fee levy for TDS statements processed u/s 200A challenged. Court observed Section 200A introduced from 01.06.2015, not applicable for assessment years 2012-13, 2013-14. In absence of Section 200A provisions, late fee u/s 234E ought not to have been imposed while processing TDS applications u/s 200A. Consequently, impugned Demand Intimation Letters set aside as liable.
Section 234E late fee levy for TDS statements processed u/s 200A challenged. Court observed Section 200A introduced from 01.06.2015, not applicable for assessment years 2012-13, 2013-14. In absence of Section 200A provisions, late fee u/s 234E ought not to have been imposed while processing TDS applications u/s 200A. Consequently, impugned Demand Intimation Letters set aside as liable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.