Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Section 234E late fee levy for TDS statements processed u/s 200A challenged. Court observed Section 200A introduced from 01.06.2015, not applicable for assessment years 2012-13, 2013-14. In absence of Section 200A provisions, late fee u/s 234E ought not to have been imposed while processing TDS applications u/s 200A. Consequently, impugned Demand Intimation Letters set aside as liable.
Section 234E late fee levy for TDS statements processed u/s 200A challenged. Court observed Section 200A introduced from 01.06.2015, not applicable for assessment years 2012-13, 2013-14. In absence of Section 200A provisions, late fee u/s 234E ought not to have been imposed while processing TDS applications u/s 200A. Consequently, impugned Demand Intimation Letters set aside as liable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.