Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Section 234E late fee levy for TDS statements processed u/s 200A challenged. Court observed Section 200A introduced from 01.06.2015, not applicable for assessment years 2012-13, 2013-14. In absence of Section 200A provisions, late fee u/s 234E ought not to have been imposed while processing TDS applications u/s 200A. Consequently, impugned Demand Intimation Letters set aside as liable.
Section 234E late fee levy for TDS statements processed u/s 200A challenged. Court observed Section 200A introduced from 01.06.2015, not applicable for assessment years 2012-13, 2013-14. In absence of Section 200A provisions, late fee u/s 234E ought not to have been imposed while processing TDS applications u/s 200A. Consequently, impugned Demand Intimation Letters set aside as liable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.