Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
The assessee trust claimed depreciation on assets, but the documents like balance sheet, income and expenditure account, and depreciation chart were not signed by auditors, chairman or accountant. The issue of depreciation claim requires verification of records to determine if assets were considered for application of income earned. Therefore, the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer to verify records, allow depreciation benefit u/s 11 after granting reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Regarding payment to a specified person, there is no provision to add advance given to income. Relying on a case, it was held that when money advanced for an agreement was returned with interest after cancellation, it cannot be treated as violation of Section 13(1)(c). Hence, this ground was allowed. Additions on account of interest-free advances given to various persons were confirmed. It was held that a mere book entry cannot be income unless income has actually resulted. The reduction in income was part of an agreement for a long-term managing agency arrangement, not a gift. Considering the facts and legal position, the additions were upheld.
The assessee trust claimed depreciation on assets, but the documents like balance sheet, income and expenditure account, and depreciation chart were not signed by auditors, chairman or accountant. The issue of depreciation claim requires verification of records to determine if assets were considered for application of income earned. Therefore, the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer to verify records, allow depreciation benefit u/s 11 after granting reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. Regarding payment to a specified person, there is no provision to add advance given to income. Relying on a case, it was held that when money advanced for an agreement was returned with interest after cancellation, it cannot be treated as violation of Section 13(1)(c). Hence, this ground was allowed. Additions on account of interest-free advances given to various persons were confirmed. It was held that a mere book entry cannot be income unless income has actually resulted. The reduction in income was part of an agreement for a long-term managing agency arrangement, not a gift. Considering the facts and legal position, the additions were upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
