Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Service tax exemption under Notification No. 25/2012-ST denied for services of laying cable under NOFN project, as the project aimed at increasing subscriber base and revenues for BSNL, falling within the ambit of 'commerce'. Notification exempts civil structures meant predominantly for use other than commerce, industry or business, which is to be interpreted strictly. Appellant not eligible for exemption. Non-recovery of service tax is an offence u/s 73. Cum-duty benefit allowed, directing recalculation of demand treating receipts as inclusive of service tax and consequential re-computation of penalty u/s 78.
Service tax exemption under Notification No. 25/2012-ST denied for services of laying cable under NOFN project, as the project aimed at increasing subscriber base and revenues for BSNL, falling within the ambit of 'commerce'. Notification exempts civil structures meant predominantly for use other than commerce, industry or business, which is to be interpreted strictly. Appellant not eligible for exemption. Non-recovery of service tax is an offence u/s 73. Cum-duty benefit allowed, directing recalculation of demand treating receipts as inclusive of service tax and consequential re-computation of penalty u/s 78.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.