Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Medical negligence requires proving the medical professional lacked requisite qualification, skill or failed to exercise reasonable care. Mere unfavorable outcome or failed treatment does not establish negligence unless evidence shows the doctor failed to exercise due skill possessed. The complainant did not adduce evidence to prove the doctor lacked expertise or failed to exercise reasonable competence. No expert testimony established the doctor's failure to exercise requisite skill. Applying res ipsa loquitur doctrine without such evidence is improper. The consumer forum erred in finding negligence and awarding compensation without sufficient proof of the doctor's failure to exercise due care and skill.
Medical negligence requires proving the medical professional lacked requisite qualification, skill or failed to exercise reasonable care. Mere unfavorable outcome or failed treatment does not establish negligence unless evidence shows the doctor failed to exercise due skill possessed. The complainant did not adduce evidence to prove the doctor lacked expertise or failed to exercise reasonable competence. No expert testimony established the doctor's failure to exercise requisite skill. Applying res ipsa loquitur doctrine without such evidence is improper. The consumer forum erred in finding negligence and awarding compensation without sufficient proof of the doctor's failure to exercise due care and skill.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
