Coercive recovery during GST searches is restrained pending scrutiny, preserving normal business operations and requiring adherence to investigation g...
COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Transfer-pricing comparability filters require fresh arm's-length analysis, while delayed receivables need separate reconsideration with working-capit...
Page of 4894
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
721 to 740 of 97867 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Notice u/s 142(1) was issued to petitioner, but respondent failed to state when it was delivered/served, violating principles of natural justice. Impugned order deserves to be set aside adopting justice-oriented approach, granting petitioner opportunity to reply to Section 142 notice. Respondent entitled to claim interest on demand amount if order passed against petitioner after remand due to lapse of four years from impugned order.
Notice u/s 142(1) was issued to petitioner, but respondent failed to state when it was delivered/served, violating principles of natural justice. Impugned order deserves to be set aside adopting justice-oriented approach, granting petitioner opportunity to reply to Section 142 notice. Respondent entitled to claim interest on demand amount if order passed against petitioner after remand due to lapse of four years from impugned order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4894 
