Transfer-pricing aggregation of distinct support-service and subcontract transactions was rejected, while debt-free receivables attracted no notional ...
Customs exemptions cover photovoltaic assembly machinery and PVF backsheets, while fully declared cleared imports may avoid confiscation and penalties...
Specific tariff classification for LCD devices overrides treatment as electricity-meter parts, defeating differential duty, extended limitation, and p...
Stayed disciplinary punishment does not establish unfitness for insolvency professional registration; reconsideration must disregard mere pendency of ...
Indirect corporate control can create related-party status, excluding financial creditors from Committee of Creditors representation, participation an...
Scientific research association approval requires continuing SIRO status, annual donation reporting, and donor certificates for the approved foundatio...
Scientific research institution approval is conditional on SIRO recognition, annual donation reporting, donor certification, and prescribed compliance...
Page of 4878
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 97553 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Challenge to the detention/impounding of rubber process oil imported by the petitioner. The key points are: The sample was tested by a Chemical Examiner, but it is unclear if the examiner was recognized as per the relevant circular. The test report dated 31.12.2014 was allegedly not provided to the petitioner, preventing them from opposing the detention/unclearing of the goods as per rules and regulations. The High Court allowed the petition, likely directing the respondents to release the goods and potentially pay compensation for the improper detention.
Challenge to the detention/impounding of rubber process oil imported by the petitioner. The key points are: The sample was tested by a Chemical Examiner, but it is unclear if the examiner was recognized as per the relevant circular. The test report dated 31.12.2014 was allegedly not provided to the petitioner, preventing them from opposing the detention/unclearing of the goods as per rules and regulations. The High Court allowed the petition, likely directing the respondents to release the goods and potentially pay compensation for the improper detention.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.