Coercive recovery during GST searches is restrained pending scrutiny, preserving normal business operations and requiring adherence to investigation g...
COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Transfer-pricing comparability filters require fresh arm's-length analysis, while delayed receivables need separate reconsideration with working-capit...
Bail application dismissed in a case involving seizure of commercial quantity of contraband. Key issues: improper sampling procedure found acceptable; delay in filing Section 52A application not prejudicial at this stage; defective notice u/s 50 NDPS Act noted but not determinative; delay in trial not prolonged enough to warrant bail. Considering the large quantity seized, stringent conditions of Section 37 NDPS Act not met for bail. Trial to proceed expeditiously, applicant can reapply if further delays occur.
Bail application dismissed in a case involving seizure of commercial quantity of contraband. Key issues: improper sampling procedure found acceptable; delay in filing Section 52A application not prejudicial at this stage; defective notice u/s 50 NDPS Act noted but not determinative; delay in trial not prolonged enough to warrant bail. Considering the large quantity seized, stringent conditions of Section 37 NDPS Act not met for bail. Trial to proceed expeditiously, applicant can reapply if further delays occur.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.