Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search ✕
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
❮ Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Filters / Advanced Search ❯
TEXT

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In
Main Text + AI Text ❯
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws---- ❯
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ---- ❯
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ---- ❯
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
☰   Show Results ❯
    Section 115BBE classification requires a valid deeming-provision basis before special taxation, while the enhanced rate's temporal application remains...
    Late-fee waiver for supplementary Bills of Entry depends on sufficient cause, not automated delay calculations alone.
    Contractual GST reimbursement depends on tax-risk allocation, while statutory compliance remains unaffected by any employer-payment adjustment.
    Medical relief registration: hospital scale and premium services do not alone defeat charitable renewal or justify retrospective cancellation.
    Retrenchment compensation classification determines tax exemption for BSNL workforce-reduction payments and separates leave encashment from voluntary-...
    Successive GST writ petitions fail when an earlier challenge was withdrawn without liberty to refile the same adjudication dispute.
    Acquiescence to a tax demand makes voluntarily admitted liability subject to consequential interest and penalty.
    Pre-trial detention in CGST prosecutions remains non-punitive, supporting bail where investigation is complete and trial is delayed.
    E-way bill reuse allegations require cogent proof, not vehicle-movement suspicion, invalidating detention-based tax and penalties.
    Coercive recovery during GST searches is restrained pending scrutiny, preserving normal business operations and requiring adherence to investigation g...
    Excess GST realisation alone cannot establish apartment-sale profiteering where no GST rate reduction or input tax credit benefit exists.
    GST rate reduction on cinema tickets must reach consumers despite maximum-price caps; retrospective anti-profiteering penalties cannot apply.
    Commensurate GST price reduction for cinema tickets overrides base-price increases where suppliers cannot prove benefits reached viewers.
    Anti-profiteering computation must reflect reversed unutilised tax credit, while later-enacted penalties cannot apply to earlier non-passing periods.
    Curative refund-formula amendments can support differential input-tax-credit refunds despite earlier claims and conflicting administrative circulars.
    Unaccounted stock taxation displaces confiscation where assessment provisions apply, leaving no standalone basis to restore a fine.
    Monetary-limit policy requires departmental GST appeals below threshold to establish a specified exception before merits review.
    Mandatory detention penalty timelines invalidate delayed orders, requiring consequential relief and reversal of affirming appellate orders.
    COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
    Mandatory detention-penalty time limits invalidate delayed orders and require release of security in transit-document discrepancy proceedings.
❮
❯
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) case...

Tribunal Remands Valuation Case for Fresh Review Due to Natural Justice Violation in Import Value Enhancement.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Customs October 26, 2024 Case Laws AT
Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) case involving valuation of imported goods - rejection of declared value - enhancement of value. The tribunal held that when the imported goods were numerous, only a few items were referenced without considering the importer's submissions. The grounds for value enhancement were not communicated to the importer, violating natural justice principles. The tribunal observed that the provisions of Rule 3(b) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 2007, regarding transaction value for imports by related persons, were not properly applied. The original authority failed to examine the values against identical or similar items imported by independent buyers from the same supplier or other contemporaneous imports. The lower appellate authority's order setting aside the original order without determining the appropriate values created a vacuum. The case was remanded to the original authority to reconsider the issue afresh, adhering to natural justice principles and examining all relevant factors within three months.

Topics

Acts Income Tax