Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Importation of an old and used car by misdeclaring it as new, resulting in undervaluation. Imposition of composite penalty u/ss 112(a), 112(b), and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962. Penalty u/s 114AA cannot be imposed as it pertains to fraudulent exports, not imports. Quantum of penalties imposed u/ss 112(a) and 112(b) unknown. Composite penalties imposed on the appellant found unsustainable. Impugned orders imposing penalties under various provisions of the Customs Act, 1962 set aside by the Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). Appeal allowed.
Importation of an old and used car by misdeclaring it as new, resulting in undervaluation. Imposition of composite penalty u/ss 112(a), 112(b), and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962. Penalty u/s 114AA cannot be imposed as it pertains to fraudulent exports, not imports. Quantum of penalties imposed u/ss 112(a) and 112(b) unknown. Composite penalties imposed on the appellant found unsustainable. Impugned orders imposing penalties under various provisions of the Customs Act, 1962 set aside by the Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). Appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
