Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Importation of an old and used car by misdeclaring it as new, resulting in undervaluation. Imposition of composite penalty u/ss 112(a), 112(b), and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962. Penalty u/s 114AA cannot be imposed as it pertains to fraudulent exports, not imports. Quantum of penalties imposed u/ss 112(a) and 112(b) unknown. Composite penalties imposed on the appellant found unsustainable. Impugned orders imposing penalties under various provisions of the Customs Act, 1962 set aside by the Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). Appeal allowed.
Importation of an old and used car by misdeclaring it as new, resulting in undervaluation. Imposition of composite penalty u/ss 112(a), 112(b), and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962. Penalty u/s 114AA cannot be imposed as it pertains to fraudulent exports, not imports. Quantum of penalties imposed u/ss 112(a) and 112(b) unknown. Composite penalties imposed on the appellant found unsustainable. Impugned orders imposing penalties under various provisions of the Customs Act, 1962 set aside by the Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). Appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
