Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search ✕
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
❮ Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Filters / Advanced Search ❯
TEXT

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In
Main Text + AI Text ❯
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws---- ❯
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ---- ❯
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ---- ❯
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    GSTR-2A mismatch requires transaction-level proof of input tax credit; cross-head set-off and unsupported remand requests fail.
    Additional court fees on GST first appeals remain payable, but non-payment dismissal was set aside for merits review.
    Interlocutory relief requires a registered appeal, while urgent cases may receive expedited scrutiny before substantive hearing.
    Input tax credit cannot be denied without transaction-specific proof of sham supplies despite retrospective supplier registration cancellation.
    Reasoned appellate GST orders require consideration of material grounds, precedents, and procedural fairness before confirming tax demands.
    Zero-rated turnover includes export invoices issued during the refund period when goods are subsequently exported from India.
    Reasoned discretion in tax-demand stays requires merits-based consideration, preventing mechanical rejection for pending appeals or circular-payment d...
    Review jurisdiction bars rehearing of unexplained bank-credit disputes where public-record evidence was available and due diligence was absent.
    Holiday-Day Limitation Computation Preserves Timely Objections and Prevents Final Assessment From Being Issued Without Mandatory Review Directions
    Disputed tax demand recovery must ordinarily remain within the stay norm during pendency of the first appeal.
    TDS statement correction limits do not excuse non-filing, while employees remain protected from employers' remittance defaults.
    DRP direction compliance permits rectification of obvious omissions, while PE, reimbursement, and guarantee pricing require factual examination.
    Committee of creditors' commercial wisdom permits replacement of a resolution professional, while fees remain subject to adjudication.
    Charitable registration scrutiny is confined to genuine activities, while domestic overseas-study scholarships remain within educational objects.
    Unexplained election expenditure requires corroborated seized-document entries and correct assessment-year attribution for tax assessment purposes.
    Supervisory permanent establishment requires project-wise duration and qualifying construction nexus; offshore supplies and salary reimbursements rema...
    Agreement-date stamp duty valuation governs stock-in-trade sales when non-cash consideration is received before the sale agreement.
    Unaccounted quarry sales: only reasonably estimated profit is taxable, while cash sales already disclosed cannot be taxed twice.
    Reassessment limitation excludes section 148A response time; Indian support-services affiliate does not create a dependent agent PE.
    Dependent-agent permanent establishment requires proof of actual contractual authority; liaison and support functions alone do not suffice.
❮
❯
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Central Excise

Denial of CENVAT credit distributed by the Head Office (Input...

CENVAT Credit Denial Overturned: Full Credit Permitted for Pre-2016 Distribution Without Proportional Requirement.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Central Excise October 26, 2024 Case Laws AT
Denial of CENVAT credit distributed by the Head Office (Input Service Distributor) to a unit during April to June 2012. The denial was based on the ground that the credit was not distributed proportionately among all units based on their respective turnovers, resulting in excess credit distribution to the unit. The key points are: Prior to the amendment effective from 01.04.2016, there was no compulsion on the assessee to distribute the credit proportionately or to all units. Even if the entire credit was distributed to one unit, it cannot be denied. The situation was revenue neutral as the other units paid more duty than the attributed credit. The CESTAT Ahmedabad held that 100% credit availed by the appellant was in order as per the existing CENVAT Credit Rules during the relevant period. Based on judgments, it is settled that even if the credit is distributed to one unit only during the relevant period, it cannot be denied. The impugned order is set aside, and the appeal is allowed.

Topics

Acts Income Tax