Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Assessee received cash consideration from sale of property, deposited in bank account and utilized to purchase another property. AO accepted transaction in regular assessment without addition. Assessee contended no violation of Section 269SS as cash received after due registration of property, as per sale agreement and CBDT circulars. ITAT allowed appeal, relying on Dhinagharan case, holding cash payment made at time of registration before sub-registrar does not violate Section 269SS. No penalty leviable u/s 271D.
Assessee received cash consideration from sale of property, deposited in bank account and utilized to purchase another property. AO accepted transaction in regular assessment without addition. Assessee contended no violation of Section 269SS as cash received after due registration of property, as per sale agreement and CBDT circulars. ITAT allowed appeal, relying on Dhinagharan case, holding cash payment made at time of registration before sub-registrar does not violate Section 269SS. No penalty leviable u/s 271D.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
