Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
The assessee failed to repay a loan to M/s. Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Pvt. Ltd., leading to the auctioning of a car during the assessment year. The successful bidder in the auction made a cash payment directly to M/s. Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Pvt. Ltd.'s bank account to clear the loan. The Appellate Tribunal held that since the cash payment was made by the bidder and not the assessee, the assessee cannot be penalized u/s 271E for violating section 269T's provisions regarding cash repayment of a loan. Consequently, the assessee's appeal against the penalty was allowed.
The assessee failed to repay a loan to M/s. Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Pvt. Ltd., leading to the auctioning of a car during the assessment year. The successful bidder in the auction made a cash payment directly to M/s. Mahindra & Mahindra Financial Services Pvt. Ltd.'s bank account to clear the loan. The Appellate Tribunal held that since the cash payment was made by the bidder and not the assessee, the assessee cannot be penalized u/s 271E for violating section 269T's provisions regarding cash repayment of a loan. Consequently, the assessee's appeal against the penalty was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
