Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Baggage-related customs confiscation orders require statutory revision, as Tribunal appellate jurisdiction is excluded for such disputes.
    Statutory auditor criminal liability requires designated responsibility, knowing false statements, or wilful default; negligence alone does not suffic...
    TReDS receivables remain operational debt, and implemented resolution plans cannot be reopened through delayed creditor reclassification claims.
    Prescriptive right of way may be protected in insolvency when access is necessary to realise liquidation-estate assets.
    Limitation in insolvency appeals remains tied to the original order, while clerical corrections do not restart statutory time limits.
    Anticipatory bail under money-laundering law requires satisfaction of twin conditions, with medical claims needing evidence of serious emergency.
    Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return filing...
    Customs arrears recovery framework creates dedicated Tax Recovery Cells with mandatory monitoring, enforcement timelines, reporting, and write-off pro...
    Export sample testing accepts valid recognised laboratory reports unless risk intervention or intelligence requires verification through existing proc...
    Self-sealing permission remains valid unless withdrawn, while EDI registrations receive interim extensions pending system enhancement.
    Express Cargo Clearance System launches at Navi Mumbai airport for electronic import and export courier shipment clearance.
    Placement memorandum filing rules enable faster AIF scheme launches while preserving manager and merchant banker disclosure accountability.
    Statutory pre-deposit defects in GST appeals must be curable before dismissal, enabling merits-based appellate consideration after compliance.
    GST reimbursement under gas-sale contracts requires admissible proof, while prior invoice payments do not automatically establish waiver or estoppel.
    Efficacious statutory appellate remedy bars writ review, while bona fide writ-pendency time may be excluded from appeal limitation.
    Natural justice in GST demand adjudication requires an effective hearing, permitting writ relief despite an alternative appellate remedy.
    Condonation of delay required where an unrepresented appellant had sufficient cause, restoring statutory appeal for merits review.
    Ex parte GST adjudication requires a fair opportunity to reply and be heard before fresh determination proceeds.
    Commensurate price reduction is mandatory for input tax credit benefits; free construction work cannot satisfy anti-profiteering obligations.
    Prompt Vivad Se Vishwas refunds remain required despite exclusion of statutory refund interest and processing constraints.
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Highlights
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries

    Highlights

    Back

    All Highlights

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      Highlights

      Back

      All Highlights

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      The High Court held that the reopening notice issued u/s 148...

      Notice to Non-Existent Entity Invalid: Court Rules Against Tax Notice Post-Amalgamation, Upholds Legal Principle.

      Contents
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Income TaxOctober 21, 2024Case LawsHC
      The High Court held that the reopening notice issued u/s 148 against a non-existent entity, i.e., the amalgamating company that had ceased to exist due to an approved scheme of amalgamation, was invalid and illegal. Despite being informed about the amalgamation, the Assessing Officer issued the jurisdictional notice solely in the name of the amalgamating company, which was fundamentally at odds with the legal principle that the amalgamating entity ceases to exist upon the approved scheme of amalgamation. The appellant's participation in the proceedings cannot operate as an estoppel against law. The Assessing Officer lacked legal basis and jurisdiction to issue the impugned notice u/s 148A(b), pass an order thereon, and further issue the impugned notice u/s 148 to a non-existing entity. Such notices were illegal, invalid, and non-est from the outset. The decision was in favor of the assessee.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax