Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The Assessing Officer (AO) failed to conduct relevant inquiries regarding the shares held as penny stocks by the assessee in GCM Securities Ltd. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) invoked Section 263, finding the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue's interests. The PCIT observed that the AO did not adequately verify the transactions involving GCM Securities Ltd. shares, which exhibited volatile price fluctuations. The PCIT relied on judicial precedents highlighting that abnormal price differences without corresponding changes in underlying security prices indicate manipulative objectives. Direct evidence of such manipulative activities is difficult to obtain. A holistic approach considering the preponderance of probabilities is required, especially when little-known companies experience steep share price rises within a short period. The assessee's argument that sale proceeds received by cheque and Securities Transaction Tax paid prove the genuineness of the long-term capital gains cannot be accepted due to adverse evidence collected by the Revenue. The PCIT set aside the issue for the AO to pass a fresh assessment order after providing adequate opportunities to the assessee. The Tribunal upheld the PCIT's directions, as the AO failed to conduct worthwhile inquiries regarding the GCM Securities Ltd. shares.
The Assessing Officer (AO) failed to conduct relevant inquiries regarding the shares held as penny stocks by the assessee in GCM Securities Ltd. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) invoked Section 263, finding the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue's interests. The PCIT observed that the AO did not adequately verify the transactions involving GCM Securities Ltd. shares, which exhibited volatile price fluctuations. The PCIT relied on judicial precedents highlighting that abnormal price differences without corresponding changes in underlying security prices indicate manipulative objectives. Direct evidence of such manipulative activities is difficult to obtain. A holistic approach considering the preponderance of probabilities is required, especially when little-known companies experience steep share price rises within a short period. The assessee's argument that sale proceeds received by cheque and Securities Transaction Tax paid prove the genuineness of the long-term capital gains cannot be accepted due to adverse evidence collected by the Revenue. The PCIT set aside the issue for the AO to pass a fresh assessment order after providing adequate opportunities to the assessee. The Tribunal upheld the PCIT's directions, as the AO failed to conduct worthwhile inquiries regarding the GCM Securities Ltd. shares.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
