Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
The Tribunal held that the onus was on the Revenue to demonstrate the Appellant's default leading to inordinate delay in allotment of shares, which the Revenue failed to discharge. Consequently, the transfer pricing adjustment treating share application money as an interest-free loan to the Associated Enterprise was deleted. Regarding the Dispute Resolution Panel's failure to consider the Assessing Officer's rectification order u/s 154 revising the income, the Assessing Officer was directed to recompute the income and tax liability after considering the rectification order. The Tribunal allowed the grounds raised by the Appellant on these issues.
The Tribunal held that the onus was on the Revenue to demonstrate the Appellant's default leading to inordinate delay in allotment of shares, which the Revenue failed to discharge. Consequently, the transfer pricing adjustment treating share application money as an interest-free loan to the Associated Enterprise was deleted. Regarding the Dispute Resolution Panel's failure to consider the Assessing Officer's rectification order u/s 154 revising the income, the Assessing Officer was directed to recompute the income and tax liability after considering the rectification order. The Tribunal allowed the grounds raised by the Appellant on these issues.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
