Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund claim for interest paid along with IGST was rejected due to non-fulfillment of pre-import conditions for goods imported under Advance Authorizations. Initially, IGST exemption was wrongly availed, but payment was made later. The pre-import condition in the notification was upheld as valid by the Supreme Court. The appellant admitted to not fulfilling the pre-import conditions, rendering them ineligible for IGST exemption. The interest liability on delayed IGST payment was automatic. The Bombay High Court's decision on interest refund for additional customs duty did not apply to IGST. The CESTAT dismissed the appeal, concluding that the refund claim for interest paid along with IGST was rightly rejected.
Refund claim for interest paid along with IGST was rejected due to non-fulfillment of pre-import conditions for goods imported under Advance Authorizations. Initially, IGST exemption was wrongly availed, but payment was made later. The pre-import condition in the notification was upheld as valid by the Supreme Court. The appellant admitted to not fulfilling the pre-import conditions, rendering them ineligible for IGST exemption. The interest liability on delayed IGST payment was automatic. The Bombay High Court's decision on interest refund for additional customs duty did not apply to IGST. The CESTAT dismissed the appeal, concluding that the refund claim for interest paid along with IGST was rightly rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
