Non-participating bidders cannot disturb concluded liquidation sales on speculative prejudice, while costs for such challenges must remain proportiona...
Section 115BBE classification requires a valid deeming-provision basis before special taxation, while the enhanced rate's temporal application remains...
Coercive recovery during GST searches is restrained pending scrutiny, preserving normal business operations and requiring adherence to investigation g...
Error apparent on record rectified by allowing Revenue's appeal instead of wrongly dismissing it, as logical conclusion of upholding Revenue's contentions. Rectification limited to correcting error on record, not re-hearing matter. Apex Court's guidelines on rectifying apparent errors followed. Request to reconsider monetary limits post-disposal not entertained, as it would reopen decided matters. CESTAT's final order dated 18.03.2024 disposing appeal upheld, no other errors found.
Error apparent on record rectified by allowing Revenue's appeal instead of wrongly dismissing it, as logical conclusion of upholding Revenue's contentions. Rectification limited to correcting error on record, not re-hearing matter. Apex Court's guidelines on rectifying apparent errors followed. Request to reconsider monetary limits post-disposal not entertained, as it would reopen decided matters. CESTAT's final order dated 18.03.2024 disposing appeal upheld, no other errors found.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4897 
