Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Error apparent on record rectified by allowing Revenue's appeal instead of wrongly dismissing it, as logical conclusion of upholding Revenue's contentions. Rectification limited to correcting error on record, not re-hearing matter. Apex Court's guidelines on rectifying apparent errors followed. Request to reconsider monetary limits post-disposal not entertained, as it would reopen decided matters. CESTAT's final order dated 18.03.2024 disposing appeal upheld, no other errors found.
Error apparent on record rectified by allowing Revenue's appeal instead of wrongly dismissing it, as logical conclusion of upholding Revenue's contentions. Rectification limited to correcting error on record, not re-hearing matter. Apex Court's guidelines on rectifying apparent errors followed. Request to reconsider monetary limits post-disposal not entertained, as it would reopen decided matters. CESTAT's final order dated 18.03.2024 disposing appeal upheld, no other errors found.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.