Transfer-pricing reimbursement adjustments require uncontrolled comparables and cannot become expense-genuineness reviews, resulting in deletion of th...
Food import sampling requirements support provisional release where unseized consignments conform to standards and raw areca classification is unestab...
Diagnostic microcuvette classification follows sole-use analytical function, placing specialised disposable cuvettes with their analyser rather than g...
Customs Broker licensing proceedings fail when their offence-report foundation collapses and authorisation, advisory, and KYC duties remain unbreached...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
501 to 520 of 97820 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Wilful misconduct - Scope of judicial review limited - Seeking removal of Resolution Professional, providing documents for objections to Resolution plan, disqualifying proposed Resolution applicant, and action against petitioner for alleged fraudulent transactions - Court held that once Resolution Professional found guilty of breach, there was no occasion for the Board to take a lenient view, especially as violations went to the root of the matter - Court cannot reappraise facts as if sitting in appeal, merely because alternate punishment seems more appropriate - Resolution Professional cautioned and warned to be careful in future, with repetition treated as willful negligence - Clarified that Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code allows single-member Disciplinary Committee - No infirmity or irregularity in constitution of single-member Committee, no malafide alleged - No merit in argument that petitioners should have been afforded personal hearing by Disciplinary Committee prior to decision on complaint - Petition disposed of.
Wilful misconduct - Scope of judicial review limited - Seeking removal of Resolution Professional, providing documents for objections to Resolution plan, disqualifying proposed Resolution applicant, and action against petitioner for alleged fraudulent transactions - Court held that once Resolution Professional found guilty of breach, there was no occasion for the Board to take a lenient view, especially as violations went to the root of the matter - Court cannot reappraise facts as if sitting in appeal, merely because alternate punishment seems more appropriate - Resolution Professional cautioned and warned to be careful in future, with repetition treated as willful negligence - Clarified that Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code allows single-member Disciplinary Committee - No infirmity or irregularity in constitution of single-member Committee, no malafide alleged - No merit in argument that petitioners should have been afforded personal hearing by Disciplinary Committee prior to decision on complaint - Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
