Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Wilful misconduct - Scope of judicial review limited - Seeking removal of Resolution Professional, providing documents for objections to Resolution plan, disqualifying proposed Resolution applicant, and action against petitioner for alleged fraudulent transactions - Court held that once Resolution Professional found guilty of breach, there was no occasion for the Board to take a lenient view, especially as violations went to the root of the matter - Court cannot reappraise facts as if sitting in appeal, merely because alternate punishment seems more appropriate - Resolution Professional cautioned and warned to be careful in future, with repetition treated as willful negligence - Clarified that Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code allows single-member Disciplinary Committee - No infirmity or irregularity in constitution of single-member Committee, no malafide alleged - No merit in argument that petitioners should have been afforded personal hearing by Disciplinary Committee prior to decision on complaint - Petition disposed of.
Wilful misconduct - Scope of judicial review limited - Seeking removal of Resolution Professional, providing documents for objections to Resolution plan, disqualifying proposed Resolution applicant, and action against petitioner for alleged fraudulent transactions - Court held that once Resolution Professional found guilty of breach, there was no occasion for the Board to take a lenient view, especially as violations went to the root of the matter - Court cannot reappraise facts as if sitting in appeal, merely because alternate punishment seems more appropriate - Resolution Professional cautioned and warned to be careful in future, with repetition treated as willful negligence - Clarified that Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code allows single-member Disciplinary Committee - No infirmity or irregularity in constitution of single-member Committee, no malafide alleged - No merit in argument that petitioners should have been afforded personal hearing by Disciplinary Committee prior to decision on complaint - Petition disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
