Capital-gains exemption for charitable trusts extends to qualifying fixed deposits, while unrecoverable TDS write-offs may constitute income applicati...
India-UK treaty characterisation of telecom-service receipts as business profits withstands unilateral domestic-law amendments for Indian tax purposes...
Transfer-pricing reimbursement adjustments require uncontrolled comparables and cannot become expense-genuineness reviews, resulting in deletion of th...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
281 to 300 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The interim moratorium u/s 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) applies only to the specific debt for which Section 95 proceedings have been initiated against a personal guarantor. It does not extend to other debts or properties of the personal guarantor or entities they are associated with. The moratorium prohibits other creditors from initiating legal action regarding the specific debt, but does not bar creditors from enforcing their rights against separate properties or entities. The IBC provisions take precedence over other laws u/s 238. In this case, the moratorium covers only the personal guarantee and does not restrain the creditor from auctioning partnership firm assets, as the firm is a separate entity from the personal guarantor. The appeal against allowing the auction was dismissed.
The interim moratorium u/s 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) applies only to the specific debt for which Section 95 proceedings have been initiated against a personal guarantor. It does not extend to other debts or properties of the personal guarantor or entities they are associated with. The moratorium prohibits other creditors from initiating legal action regarding the specific debt, but does not bar creditors from enforcing their rights against separate properties or entities. The IBC provisions take precedence over other laws u/s 238. In this case, the moratorium covers only the personal guarantee and does not restrain the creditor from auctioning partnership firm assets, as the firm is a separate entity from the personal guarantor. The appeal against allowing the auction was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.