Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The interim moratorium u/s 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) applies only to the specific debt for which Section 95 proceedings have been initiated against a personal guarantor. It does not extend to other debts or properties of the personal guarantor or entities they are associated with. The moratorium prohibits other creditors from initiating legal action regarding the specific debt, but does not bar creditors from enforcing their rights against separate properties or entities. The IBC provisions take precedence over other laws u/s 238. In this case, the moratorium covers only the personal guarantee and does not restrain the creditor from auctioning partnership firm assets, as the firm is a separate entity from the personal guarantor. The appeal against allowing the auction was dismissed.
The interim moratorium u/s 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) applies only to the specific debt for which Section 95 proceedings have been initiated against a personal guarantor. It does not extend to other debts or properties of the personal guarantor or entities they are associated with. The moratorium prohibits other creditors from initiating legal action regarding the specific debt, but does not bar creditors from enforcing their rights against separate properties or entities. The IBC provisions take precedence over other laws u/s 238. In this case, the moratorium covers only the personal guarantee and does not restrain the creditor from auctioning partnership firm assets, as the firm is a separate entity from the personal guarantor. The appeal against allowing the auction was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
